Friedman, Dazzio, Zulanas & Bowling space Friedman, Dazzio, Zulanas & BOWLING, P.C. BIRMINGHAM OFFICE 3800 CORPORATE WOODS DRIVE, BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA 35242 P 205-278-7000  F 205-278-7001 Friedman, Dazzio, Zulanas & BOWLING, P.C. MONTGOMERY OFFICE 401 MADISON AVENUE, MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36104 P 334-387-0529
Friedman, Dazzio, Zulanas & Bowling Home Page Friedman, Dazzio, Zulanas & Bowling, P.C. News The Law Firm of Friedman, Dazzio, Zulanas & Bowling, P.C. The Attorneys Of Friedman, Dazzio, Zulanas & Bowling, P.C. Friedman, Dazzio, Zulanas & Bowling Practice Areas Contact Friedman, Dazzio, Zulanas & Bowling, P.C.

Friedman Attorneys Get Defense Verdict In Water Remediation And Mold Exposure Case After Nine Day Trial


Chris Zulanas and Jess Boone obtained a defense verdict after a nine day trial where the plaintiff claimed that a water remediation company failed to properly dry out her home following a water heater leak four days before Christmas. The plaintiff contended that the defendant's alleged noncompliance with industry standards allowed mold to develop in her home, caused her to develop reactive airway disease for which she spent a week in the hospital and prevented her from living in her home for more than 2.5 years after the leak. The plaintiff sued her homeowner's insurance company and the water remediation company. She sought recovery of money damages for repair costs, contaminated contents inside her entire home and mental anguish as a result of her physical condition and not being able to return to her home after the leak. The jury returned a defense verdict.


Contributing Authors:

Christopher J. Zulanas
Christopher J. Zulanas, Shareholder
Email Address czulanas@friedman-lawyers.com
Direct Line 205-278-7050
vCard View Profile
Jess S. Boone
Jess. S. Boone, Shareholder
Email Address jboone@friedman-lawyers.com
Direct Line Download vCard
vCard View Profile

 

< Back to News Home Page

 

This client alert is provided solely for educational and informational purposes. It is not intended to constitute legal advice. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.